Re: paramagnestism for general J

Posted by Steve Simon on April 3, 2013, 7:13 pm, in reply to "Re: paramagnestism for general J"

Yes, I think that is correct. That is the Brillouin function, see here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brillouin_and_Langevin_functions

---

Message Thread paramagnestism for general J - student March 19, 2013, 10:38 pm Re: paramagnestism for general J - Banana April 3, 2013, 6:05 pm Re: paramagnestism for general J - Steve Simon April 3, 2013, 6:32 pm Re: paramagnestism for general J - Banana April 3, 2013, 7:05 pm Re: paramagnestism for general J - Steve Simon April 3, 2013, 7:13 pm Re: paramagnestism for general J - Banana April 3, 2013, 7:24 pm Re: paramagnestism for general J - Steve Simon March 20, 2013, 2:27 am « Back to index

---

Post a Response